樂威壯levitra是改善男性勃起功能障礙的藥物,通常是在性刺激過程中陰莖因為陰莖動脈和海綿體平滑肌鬆弛,正品購買推薦 樂威壯,國際知名品牌,安全有保證。

Is Constitutional amendment a ‘law’ 13(2).-

Is Constitutional amendment a ‘law’ article 13(2)

For Free Online Demo Classes of LLB tution (English and Hindi) by Asstt. Prof. Rekha Khandelwal,

fill the google form, click herhttps://forms.gle/mSi4VsEwUMhHwBnA6

Prepared by Assist. Professor Rekha Khandelwal

Constitution of India

Is Constitutional amendment a ‘law’ under article 13(2).- 

Whether the word ‘law’ in clause (2) of article 13 also includes a ‘Constitutional amendment’. The question was considered for the first time by the supreme court.

In Shankari Prasad V Union of India, [1]AIR 1951 SC 458

The court held that the word ‘law’ in clause (2) did not include law made by Parliament under Article 368. The word ‘law’ in Article 13  should mean rules or regulations made in the exercise of general legislative power and not amendments to the constitution made in the exercise of constitutional powers, and therefore, do not affect amendments made under Article 13 (2).

Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan,[2]AIR 1965 SC 845

In this case the interpretation of Shankari Prasad’s case was followed by the majority.

Golak Nath v. State of Punjab,[3]AIR 1967 SC 1643

But in this case the supreme court overruled the decision of the aforesaid cases, and held that the word ‘law’ in article 13(2) included every branch of law, statutory, constitutional, etc.,and hence,  if an amendment to the constitution took away or abridged fundamental right of citizens, the amendment would be declared void.

 In order to remove the difficulty created by the supreme court’s decision in Golaknath’s case the Constitution (24th Amendment) Act, 1971 was enacted. By this amendment in new clause (4) was added to article 13 of the constitution which makes it clear that constitutional amendments passed under Article 368 shall not be considered as ‘law’ within the meaning of article 13 and, therefore, cannot be challenged as infringing the provisions of a part III of the constitution.

Keshavanand Bharti Case v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461

In this case the validity of the constitution (24th Amendment) Act, 1971 was considered by the Supreme Court. The court  overruled the Golaknath case and upheld the validity of the 24th amendment.

Thus, the post explains -Is Constitutional amendment a ‘law’ article 13(2)

.


[1] Shankari Prasad V Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 458

[2] Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1965 SC 845

[3] Golaknath v. State of Punjab, AIR 1967 SC 1643

Plz. click the link to know about Legal Study Material For all Purpose

Forensic evidences in trial
About Happy Healthy Society

Happy Healthy Society is an initiative to improve the Educational, Financial, Physical, Mental & Spiritual health of the society.

Get Started
Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
Youtube
Consent to display content from Youtube
Vimeo
Consent to display content from Vimeo
Google Maps
Consent to display content from Google
Spotify
Consent to display content from Spotify
Sound Cloud
Consent to display content from Sound